Report of the Working Group On Business and Economy 6. APPENDICES |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.1 Health-check summary – Business and the Economy in Cookham 6.1.1. Employment.
6.1.2. Business support
6.1.3. Training and Education
6.1.4 Learning and Skills Development
6.1.5 Retail and village centre services in Cookham
6.1.6. Commercial and Industrial Property
6.1.7 Tourism and Visitor services
6.1.8. Key Numbers Cookham GDP is estimated to be circa £15m split as below: -
Main employment sectors: -
6.2 Breakdown of businesses registered in the Cookhams:- (click on image for larger version)
6.3 Results from postal/email B & E questionnaire – Oct 2006 Sample details
Type of business (Total Population)
6.5 Concept design proposals for the Station Parade CONCEPT DESIGN PROPOSALS Background: The existing shops and car park adjacent to Cookham railway station was commented on by several of the sub-groups working on the Cookham Plan. The station acts as a gateway into the Cookhams for those arriving by train, and yet the design of the area around the station is out of keeping with the broader image of the Cookhams. It is nevertheless an important resource for the Cookhams, containing the sort of everyday and practical shops that any community needs, compared to the rather more tourist and visitor orientated balance of shops, pubs and restaurants in Cookham Village. Analysis of the existing buildings, car park and landscape context: The architecture of Station Parade drew much comment during the preparation of the Cookham Plan, which is by present day standards somewhat uninspiring. It is neither high quality contemporary architecture nor a convincing retro design to blend in with the predominantly Victorian, Edwardian and 1930’s surroundings along Station Hill and High Road. Visual unity – as well as shelter from rain - is provided by the continuous canopy over the front of the shops, although as shop signs have strayed higher up the frontages on to the fascia of the canopy the effect of the strong horizontal line is becoming broken up. Matching white weatherboarding has been replaced on some units above the shops with uPVC weatherboarding. The same is true of window frames, as many of the original timber ones have been replaced with white uPVC frames. The condition of the car park is poor, with many patched up pot holes, areas of sunken paving, badly repaired retaining walls and raised planting beds containing unimaginative planting long overdue for some replacement. The mature trees however are a real benefit and have the scale to necessary to have a positive impact on the appearance. It is apparent from large scale O.S. mapping - and from satellite views on Google Earth - how the parade sits in a sea of hard surfacing, compared to surrounding streets where there is much more ‘green’, making those trees all the more significant. Surfacing to the rear of the units is concrete, forming an impermeable barrier to rainwater reaching the sub-soil. With moves towards sustainable drainage solutions (SUDS) using permeable surfacing and below ground rainwater storage or infiltration to the sub-grade, this should be considered for some or all of the large hard surfaced area. There are some meaningless details in the landscaping, and confusing use of surface materials, for example at the corner of the station building, where a road spur is terminated by a row of concrete bollards, the footpath along Station Hill becomes the road surface without any delineation. Paved cut-throughs between the brick walled raised beds are blocked by car parking spaces, so crossing from Countrystore to the shops in the parade involves squeezing past cars or walking along the top of the low brick walls. The main entry/exit for cars doesn’t provide a pedestrian route, although there is a wide path at the eastern end of the car park. When all the spaces in front of the shops are in use, the cars form a barrier, with no designated cut throughs or wheelchair friendly routes. A proportion of spaces should be designated for disabled use and be of larger dimensions, but there are none for the shops, and only one for the station at present. Some of the parking is associated with the station, owned by Network Rail, and some of the spaces are now taken up with a local recycling facility. There is also a station car park on the other side of the railway line, which historically seems to be shared with the pub on the corner (now an Indian restaurant), the car repair garage and cars belonging to cottages along High Road. (The recently burnt out car had been left with the garage for repair.) There is also a BT public telephone box in the north east corner. Back in Station Parade, there is an awkward area of paving in front of the dry cleaners and the Chinese takeaway, with strange changes of level and no real separation from the road and parking surface. On the edge of this is a horrible looking piece of retaining wall, apparently made out of mortar rather than any proper building material.
The road past the station has an old one-way sign, but generally all the parked cars are pointing in the opposite direction! A left turn out of this exit onto station Hill is difficult and hazardous.
Why this proposal is being produced: A concept design proposal has been commissioned in order to stimulate discussion with various landowners and interested parties. It is not intended to be a fully worked out detail design scheme, but rather a look at possible improvements to the visual impact of the area. One issue is the idea of providing a transport interchange outside the station, for taxis and a bus route. This would probably be for a smaller size of single deck bus. Coupled with this would be the closing off of the narrow road outside the station, so there is one properly designed entry and exit for the car park and the station forecourt. There would need to be a bus-turning space and bus stop, and also a kiss and ride lane outside the station. This turn-around and kiss & ride would be one way, but the rest of the car park circulation would be two way. Possible layouts for this layout are restricted if it is accepted that the mature trees should remain. Whilst maintaining overall car parking provision, the main priorities are to improve the visual impact of the shop buildings and improve the layout, appearance and quality of the forecourt to the shops and the station for pedestrians. There is certainly scope to improve the design of the hard landscape to conform better to DDA requirements.
Dec 2007 final version |
MAIN REPORT INDEX | BUSINESS AND ECONOMY CONTENTS |